How to prevent innocents from being executed. Sort of.

In the latest example of Republican self-importance and the committment to image over reality comes this shocker from the Washington Post.

You know how more and more death row inmates are being set free after a review finds them innocent? Yes, in the age of DNA testing we're seeing that significant numbers of those sentenced to die were in fact not guilty. If that sounds like a good reason to suspend executions, you're right. If that sounds like a good reason to prevent review of their cases, you're a Republican...

CONGRESS HAS a novel response to the rash of prisoners over the past few years who have been exonerated of capital crimes after being tried and convicted: Keep similar cases out of court. Both chambers of the national legislature are quietly moving a particularly ugly piece of legislation designed to gut the legal means by which prisoners prove their innocence.

Habeas corpus is the age-old legal process by which federal courts review the legality of detentions. In the modern era, it has been the pivotal vehicle through which those on death row or serving long sentences in prison can challenge their state-court convictions. Congress in 1996 rolled back habeas review considerably; federal courts have similarly shown greater deference -- often too much deference -- to flawed state proceedings. But the so-called Streamlined Procedures Act of 2005 takes the evisceration of habeas review, particularly in capital cases, to a whole new level. It should not become law.

For a great many capital cases, the bill would eliminate federal review entirely. Federal courts would be unable to review almost all capital convictions from states certified by the Justice Department as providing competent counsel to convicts to challenge their convictions under state procedures.