Frist nailed on filibuster
From Think Progress (emphasis theirs):
Think Progress adds that Paez' nomination had been pending for four years before Frist opted for the filibuster. What an asshole.
UPDATE: Sweet, sweet, video from Crooks 'n Liars! Video-WMP 3megs. Seriously, this guy is such a dick it's incredible.
This morning on the floor of the Senate, Sen. Chuck Schumer asked Majority Leader Bill Frist a simple question:
SEN. SCHUMER: Isn’t it correct that on March 8, 2000, my colleague [Sen. Frist] voted to uphold the filibuster of Judge Richard Paez?
Here was Frist’s response:
The president, the um, in response, uh, the Paez nomination - we’ll come back and discuss this further. … Actually I’d like to, and it really brings to what I believe - a point - and it really brings to, oddly, a point, what is the issue. The issue is we have leadership-led partisan filibusters that have, um, obstructed, not one nominee, but two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, in a routine way.Think Progress adds that Paez' nomination had been pending for four years before Frist opted for the filibuster. What an asshole.
UPDATE: Sweet, sweet, video from Crooks 'n Liars! Video-WMP 3megs. Seriously, this guy is such a dick it's incredible.
<< Home